Here we go (translator AI was used, so there might be some stupid mistakes because the original Russian text is highly sarcastic):
How to prevent Trump from becoming Russia's new Reagan
Preface
"I asked the ash tree..." (quote from a song) More precisely, I asked the Chinese Deepseek AI:
"What do you call people who live well by exploiting people and resources in other countries?"
And the Chinese AI responded well (not all AIs are as stupidly liberal as YandexGPT):
"People who live well by exploiting other people in other countries can be called exploiters or colonizers, depending on the context. In the modern world, such practices are often associated with neocolonialism or economic exploitation, when richer countries or corporations use the resources and labor of less developed countries for their own benefit.
You can also use the term "global elites" or "transnational exploiters" if we are talking about groups of people who benefit from global inequality. In a more everyday context, such people are sometimes called "parasites" or "oppressors", but these terms are evaluative and emotionally charged."
So, in friendly negotiations with seasoned parasites from across the Puddle, we should not forget who they really are. And who they have always been.
This note is written out of fear that various lovers of America inside our country and seekers of common values will push the VPR to make concessions, the price of which in strategic terms will be high. Because this has happened more than once. I remember the last time it was announced that we already have common values with America - the late Gorbachev, the early Yeltsin. When our ideological helplessness, the desire to see in it a like-minded person and friend, brought it benefit and enrichment, and to us ruin, which has not happened since the Hitler invasion of 1941. After all, America will gobble up as much as we allow it to gobble up, and will not choke.
Our right-wing conservatives, it seems, are American patriots
Here is what people from the right-wing conservative camp, who used to be on guard for Russia's interests, write:
"And then: bam! – it turns out that America can be completely different, very nice, and Americans are not only the movie black ladies-professors and half-boys-half-girls suffering from gender ambiguity, but also masculine bearded white guys who are capable of giving our Soviet grandfathers a run for their money.
And the latter simply don’t know what to do. Not in foreign policy – in domestic policy.”
https://t.me/yaroslav_belousov/3211
“Dark times are coming for our hidebound propaganda: it’s one thing to laugh on TV at the falling Biden and crowds of transvestites – and quite another thing to try to oppose Trump’s young ministers, zealous Catholics, with our friendly multinational people headed by the horsemen of the Apocalypse, deputies Gurulev, Kartapolov, Sobolev and super-Bolshevik Prilepin.
On one side, American young predators, champions of traditional values, and on our side? Muttering and gurgling communists-analogues?
Well, how can our propaganda laugh at the Americans now?
"So dumb!"
But who?"
https://t.me/c/1441772003/204132
"Now the Americans are teaching Western Europe democracy. The Americans did this once. After the end of World War II, in their occupation zone of Germany. Literally, this was the program: teach the Germans democracy. Therefore, it really is "democracy training 2.0."
https://t.me/natatanshina/3023
"Thirdly, he (Vance) linked all the evil with the suppression of freedom to the legacy of the Soviet Union defeated in the Cold War. That is, Prilepin's neo-Soviet, unlike Solzhenitsyn's Russia, has no chance of meaningful value dialogue in its communication with Vance's America (and this is probably 12 years)."
https://t.me/holmogor_talks/38193
"So, Vance's speech, and the handsome Vance himself - this is such an ideal Reagan America from the movies, which we fell in love with in the eighties, wanting to become the same. And for the sake of this dream, we gave up everything. Against the background of young Vance (he is a month older than me), who sincerely believes in what he says, our establishment seems like dull boring bureaucrats. Especially for sincere patriotic youth who are not about a bureaucratic career. I want to immediately unite with the Americans and make the global North great again. When our democracy is scolded by some Victoria Nuland, no thoughts arise except for wishing her a Nutmeg collar. And you can't help but listen to J.D.."
https://t.me/mariasergeyeva/1080
"Russia and conservative America are value allies."
https://t.me/holmogor_talks/38224
It is interesting that our right-wing conservatives quite rightly called liberals patriots of some other country, not Russia, and often rightly reproached leftists for their indifference to the interests of Russia and the united Russian people, and suddenly those on. And the rhetoric is in the same style as that of liberals - Russia is backward, calloused, "Soviet state grandfathers", "neosovok", "communists-analogovnets", etc.
who wanted to be exactly like the Anglo-Saxon colonizers. In everything, and they also wanted to make America great again. They had already switched to intensive agriculture, had schools, published newspapers, wore the same clothes as the Anglo-Saxons. And what happened?
According to the acts of Congress of 1825 and 1830 (Indian Removal Act) - everything according to the law - the Indians of the Atlantic coast and areas east of the Mississippi were deported to the west along a route that, due to the huge number of victims, received the name of the Road of Tears. And on the Atlantic coast, the lands of deported or exterminated Indians were transferred to a profitable plantation economy based on advanced slave labor (in fact, this was the goal of clearing the lands of Indians). The so-called "Indian territory" provided to the deported tribes was a place of their extinction in conditions of overcrowding and an unfamiliar habitat. And after 30-40 years, this land began to be distributed to white colonists. In general, out of 800 treaties concluded by the American government with Indian tribes, three quarters were violated by the American government, as soon as the balance of power changed, and it was possible to continue expansion.
An episode of Indian genocide, the massacre at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, USA, 1890.
And as one of the best American generals, Philip Sheridan, said: "Of all the Indians I have met, the only good ones were dead Indians." He also expressed himself about the extermination of Indians by starvation: "Bison hunters have done more in the last two years to solve the acute Indian problem than the entire regular army has done in the last 30 years. They are destroying the material base of the Indians. Send them gunpowder and lead, if you like, and let them kill, skin and sell their skins until they exterminate all the bison!"
And no one condemned him for not conforming to American values.
As a result of a methodical and planned process - dozens of Indian tribes disappeared, 98% of the lands of the indigenous population passed into the hands of visitors from Europe, and only 220 thousand people of the indigenous population remained by the beginning of the 20th century.
Our right-wing conservatives want to be white masters, but I'm afraid that white masters have always seen us in the role of Indians.
Actually, the Russians could have shared the fate of the American Indians. And only a strong Russian state and the sovereign's service people prevented this scenario. That is why our state and our strong sovereigns are so disliked abroad, against whom a slander campaign has been waged for almost 500 years, to which our intelligentsia, both right and left, raised on Western cliches, willingly joins.
America's Values Are Not Our Values. American Tradition
So what are America's values?
Deprived of rituals, and even of true Christian essence, Anglo-Saxon Protestantism not by chance turned to the example of ancient Eastern "biblical" atrocities and mass murders, carried out on the principle of the exclusivity of the "chosen people". For example, the beginning of the genocide of the Indians - the extermination in 1636-37 of the Pequot and Niantic tribes living on the shores of Massachusetts Bay ("Mystic Massacre", etc.) - was clothed by the Anglo-Saxon Puritans in pseudo-biblical forms. John Mason, who led the extermination raid against the Pequot Indians, described the destruction of the tribe, including women and children, as follows: "The attack on the Pequot was an act of God, who laughed at His enemies and the enemies of His people, contemptuously sending them to the fiery Gehenna. And the Lord became a judge over the heathen, filling the Mystic River with corpses." (Captain John Mason. Brief history of the Pequot War. 1897.)
And it was the Protestant ethic that transferred material avarice, greed and envy from the realm of sin to the realm of highly moral action (this is actually what Protestantism was created for), allowing the rational utilization of any resources, living and nonliving. God's love for man, his chosenness, was now determined by the material success he achieved.
The principle of "freedom of conscience" destroyed conscience as such; and this concept - disturbing and oppressive, connected with what stands above the human "ego" - disappeared from the American ethical dictionary. As well as the concept of the sinfulness of greed, pride, vanity, hypocrisy.
it is already fit to bring in profit
The new ethics was reflected in the principles of economic life: maximization of profits and reduction of costs, to which were attributed the remnants of the old morality and spirituality.
"Last winter at a banquet in a club called "In the Far Ends of the Earth", the chairman, a retired military man of high rank, proclaimed in a loud voice and with great enthusiasm: "We are Anglo-Saxons, and when an Anglo-Saxon wants something, he goes and gets it."
The chairman's statement caused thunderous applause. At the banquet there were no less than seventy-five civilian guests and twenty-five army and naval officers. It must have been about two minutes before they exhausted their excessive delight at this amazing thing.
And in this regard, I recall the five Indian so-called "civilized tribes" of the Atlantic coast of the United States,
declaration." (Mark Twain. "We are Anglo-Saxons")
America and Russia. America will always screw up
But maybe the relations between America and Russia were of a different nature? Not really. More precisely, Russia has opened its arms to America many times, but each time it ended with a blow to the solar plexus.
A significant role in the victory of the US central government over the secessionist Confederation was played by the dispatch of two Russian squadrons to the American shores, which prevented the intervention of the English fleet on the side of the South (the reason for the secession of the South from the USA was its greater connection with the economy of England, which received almost 90% of the cotton from the plantations of the southern states, than with the economy of the North of the USA). Actually, in 1867, Russia ceded Alaska to its friend and ally - the USA. But what happened next, how did that traditional white America, so beloved by right-wing conservatives, thank us?
Already in the 1880s, George Kennan, Sr., a telegraph operator, was retrained as the main American Russophobe. Starting with Kennan's magazine "Century", a stream of articles about the "horrible Siberian exile" began to appear in the American media. Organizations like the Society of Friends of Russian Freedom began to be created, directly financing militants and terrorists in Russia. Incidentally, in the US itself at this time, the genocide of the indigenous population was entering a decisive phase, the extermination of the Midwestern Indians was taking place, including through the aforementioned extermination of their food resource - bison; and how little conscience the American "human rights activists" had to have to whistle about the Siberian exile...
Having had good training on the Indian tribes and Mexico, the US entered the world, captured Hawaii, after which the rapid extinction of the indigenous population began there too. Then comes the turn of Central America, where the word "banana republics" is born, because democracy was established there in such a beautiful form, as the United Fruit Corporation needs it. They pluck the decrepit Spanish empire, simultaneously destroying about 200 thousand inhabitants of the Philippines, who did not want to free themselves from the Spaniards the way the Americans would like. In general, they democratically grab everything that is lying around, which meant the shameless plundering of resources of new and new regions by American corporations and the growth of the power of American banks. And then everywhere.
But none of this interested the American "human rights activists". They were only concerned with Russia.
Money for undermining Russia, for terrorists and separatists, flows like a full-flowing river from American financial capital. And especially from the banking group that runs the largest bank Kuhn, Loeb & Co and a number of other large banks. This group included the Schiff, Loeb and Warburg families, who in addition to their financial bond were also connected by marriage and family ties. A sort of well-woven snake pit. The role of the ringleader was played by Jacob (Jacob) Heinrich Schiff, the manager of Kuhn, Loeb & Co and a hereditary banker. His father worked in the bank of the Rothschild family. Jacob Schiff himself, having moved to the USA and married Solomon Loeb's daughter, Teresa, instantly soared to the top of the banking pyramid. (And his daughter Frieda marries Felix Warburg, a senior partner in the bank Kuhn, Loeb & Co. Felix's brother Paul Warburg not only marries Solomon Loeb's daughter Nina, but also becomes the founding father of the US Federal Reserve System, which will make the dollar the world's settlement and reserve currency, when the rest of the world will pay for the American banquet. Felix Warburg's daughter Carola marries a representative of the Rothschild family - Walter Nathan Rothschild. Another brother of Felix, Max Warburg, having started out working in the English Rothschild bank N. M. Rotschild & Sons and having his own family bank M. M. Warburg & Ko, will become one of the founders of the infamous German chemical concern IG Farben, the manufacturer of "Zyklon B" for gas chambers, and will be on the board of the German Reichsbank during the Third Reich, until 1938.) The Kuhn, Loeb & Co bank will issue huge loans to Japan during the Russo-Japanese War - Jacob Schiff will even receive two orders from Japan for his "exploits". And Max Warburg with Hjalmar Schacht will attract huge American investments into the economy of Nazi Germany.
And all these banksters are also traditional America, which is so dear to our right-wing conservatives.
I believe that in fact the turn in American policy towards sharp anti-Russian sentiment was not connected with human rights - at this time Western countries violate them on an industrial scale, conducting a colonial division of the world, with machine guns against spears and arrows, exterminating or starving millions of people, seizing communal lands, introducing forced, often exterminating labor with cruel punishments for tens of millions of "negligent natives". But with plans to seize the Russian Far East and Siberia.
After the disappearance of "tsarism" nothing changed, because American interest in Russia's resources does not depend on our system. And
American GIs appeared in our Far East and the North in 1918 (by the way, they were invited to Murmansk by comrade Trotsky, who had recently arrived from the USA). Under their supervision, everything of any value was taken overseas from the occupied territory. The RGIA has preserved the "Acts on the tortured and shot peasants in the Olginsky district in 1918-1920". Here is an excerpt from it: "Having captured the peasants I. Gonevchuk, S. Gorshkov, P. Oparin and Z. Murashko, the Americans buried them alive for their connections with the local partisans. And they dealt with the wife of the partisan E. Boychuk in the following way: they stabbed her body with bayonets and drowned her in a garbage pit. The peasant Bochkarev was disfigured beyond recognition with bayonets and knives: his nose, lips and ears were cut off, his jaw was knocked out, his face and eyes were stabbed with bayonets, his whole body was cut up. At the station of Sviyagino, the partisan N. Myasnikov was tortured in the same brutal way; according to an eyewitness, they first cut off his ears, then his nose, arms and legs, and chopped him into pieces alive." Along the way, the American financial and industrial barons gaped at the concessions in the young Soviet republic and managed to grab quite a bit.
- In response to our sincere alliance in World War II and gifts to the Americans in the form of West Berlin and South Korea in 1945, America responded by financing and organizing all types of struggle against the USSR. Moreover, it was no secret that this was a struggle specifically against the Russian state, see the 1959 Congressional Act "On Captive Nations" - which was a plan to break up Russia. To fight against the war-torn and bloodless USSR, good Uncle Sam used terrorism, separatism, outright fascists, organized slander campaigns in the world media - for example, on the topic of equating the USSR with the Third Reich, physically destroyed forces friendly to us all over the world, from Greece to the Philippines. From West Germany, occupied by the "allies", the USSR received zero reparations for the restoration of territories devastated by the fascists. Traditional America carried out the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to intimidate Moscow, and would have gladly dropped atomic bombs on Russian cities if it had not been afraid of retaliation.
- Traditional America responded to our policy of détente and increased supplies of energy resources to the West during the Arab oil embargo with an oil price war, as soon as it got us hooked on the oil needle, and by arming the Afghan mujahideen.
- Traditional America responded to our perestroika friendship and introduction to "universal human values" by organizing the collapse of the USSR, the plundering and deindustrialization of Russia in the 90s - hundreds of advisers worked on this in Russia, including government agencies like the State Property Committee; about two trillion dollars were pumped out of our territory to the West, mainly to the banks of the USA and Britain.
- America responded to our proposal to jointly fight terrorism after 9/11 by creating bestial Russophobic regimes on the outskirts of Russia.
American liberals and American conservatives are two wings of the American system, where real power belongs to the moneybags, whom no one has ever elected. They are united in all essential issues. Including the issue of American exceptionalism and maintaining American hegemony at any cost, preserving the dominant position of the dollar, extracting various forms of rent and surplus product from all over the world. The only difference between them is in tactics. Conservatives would like to preserve America's industrial potential, especially the military-industrial complex, liberals are more oriented toward financial capital and media corporations. Conservatives like outright militarism (directed outward) and police violence (within society). Liberals are more cunning, deceitful and hypocritical, their strong point is brainwashing, large-scale information and psychological operations, control of the media. But if the topic of trans and gays turned out to be too toxic for some people, you can shove it under the carpet for a while.
Russian tradition
Russia has never had and will never have common values with the United States, unless it wants to disappear. Russia is a country of service people, combining military, civil, and often economic functions. (A country of Kshatriyas, to use the well-known Indian terminology.) The service person was the main force, the creator and stronghold of our state? Not a feudal lord, not a bourgeois and not a bureaucrat. (In the country, which already stretched to the Pacific Ocean in the late 1630s, there were about a hundred clerks and one thousand sub-clerks, that was actually the entire bureaucratic apparatus.) Its ideology is the ability to stand up and die “for one’s friends,” the idea of equal participation in government work, in serving the united Fatherland. (It is clear that ideology is an ideal image, but the desire to correspond to the ideal image is also important.) Russia is a service society created by the need to survive in harsh natural and climatic conditions, centuries-old intracontinental isolation, with a huge, rapidly growing territory and borders not protected by any natural
barriers. Departure from this principle, the transfer of complete power to the big bourgeoisie with its instincts of buying and selling and maximizing its profits, including in the sphere of mass media and culture, has always brought disasters, both at the beginning of the 20th century, and during perestroika and the 90s.
In Russia, the rise of the big bourgeoisie to power has always meant subordination to the West (capitalism is a hierarchical system and Russia can only be a periphery in the capitalist world-economy) and the first thing the big bourgeoisie tried to do was to break the service man, to break the spirit of the kshatriya. And the majority of right-wing conservatives, who constantly demonstrate signs of loyalty to the empire, and the leftists, who supposedly stand for the happiness of the working people, are thoroughly imbued with not a peasant, not an aristocratic, but a bourgeois spirit.
And America is a Vaishya country (in Indian terminology), created by the big bourgeoisie and its secret organizations; 99% of the signatories of the American Declaration of Independence were large slave traders and most were Masons.
Our confrontation with the West is civilizational, which is not understood by many right-wing conservatives, nor leftists, nor, especially, liberals. They do not see the Russian civilization, indivisible in time and space, with its own system of values (even if not formulated in the form of an official doctrine). And if liberals almost openly declare that Russia is just a set of resources that must be used for the benefit of the advanced Western civilization. Then for the leftists and right-wing conservatives this is recorded subconsciously, even against their will, because they are concerned either with the “good of all mankind” or with unification with “traditional America” and “white Europe”.
On the Western side, we are confronted by the financial oligarchy, which is not only the master of big money and the lord of financial flows, but also the slaves of capital accumulation. In Western civilization (and America is the master of the West), religion, culture, social institutions, governments, and the media are only shells, masks of capital. Capital is the source of power and subordination, meanings, and goal-setting. Just as all the diversity of chemical elements grows out of the growth of atomic mass, so all the historical aspects of Western civilization - the slave trade, the plunder of colonies, the destruction of hundreds of tribes and peoples who reduced the profitability of assets, the dominance of the dollar, corporatocracy, neocolonial methods of maintaining the backwardness of Third World countries, newfangled LGBT and transgenderism - grow out of the needs of capital growth. Including methods of reducing the population - capital needs less and less living labor, and, therefore, does not need people consuming non-renewable resources in the same quantity. The processes of capital accumulation created the entire history of the USA, starting from the genocide of the indigenous population, the cleansing of the American continent from the indigenous population, plantation slavery, and its subsequent development on purely capitalist trade and monetary grounds.
Comparing Russia and the USA is like comparing a peasant and a bandit. America, like the entire West, has never been content with what it has, but has climbed into any point on the globe, stealing and appropriating other people's means of production, other people's labor, the results of other people's labor and other people's resources. Therefore, even today, one percent of the world's population (located mainly in Western countries, or serving the interests of Western capital in the countries of the world periphery) gets more than 80% of the world's wealth created in a year - this is the world that Uncle Sam built. But today the hegemon has weakened, lost its economic leadership, and after that, the loss of leadership in all other areas will follow. It is critical for him to stop us first, to neutralize us, and with China too. Only the demos wanted to start with us, and the resps with China.
In what case can negotiations be useful
Donnie and JD have not returned Russia and are not going to return its stolen money, and American money, weapons, intelligence systems, communications and targeting continue to kill Russian people. And American military aid to Banderastan continues to flow, and American cluster munitions are flying at our guys. And such "negotiations" with simultaneous strangulation are completely in the American style. And such deals are completely in the American style, when Russia gives America something real, and America gives Russia beautiful words about "freedom" and "trust" and pats us on the shoulder.
And today again our progressive public, cobbled together in the 90s, both left and right, and businessmen, journalists and artists, are again pushing the military-political leadership of the country to play a game of give-away. Because for many of them it is profitable; their well-being (financial or psychological) is tied to various kinds of dependence of the country on the West/USA.
While we hear from America the promise of such goodies, which in fact are not goodies, rather the opposite. We do not need the return of Western corporations to where they left. We are somehow creating our own technological chains. And foreign capital will again knock out domestic producers and grow new Navalnyites in their Russian offices. We don’t need foreign capital that has settled on raw materials exports – this is generally a classic scheme of economic and political dependence: we give them cheap raw materials, they give us an expensive final high-tech product, and that too on their own terms. We are still dealing with the consequences of this situation created in the 90s.
We can achieve something through negotiations with the United States only if we believe in our purpose and our values. And we will not resemble the obsequious lackeys of America, which were the late Soviet Gorbachev elite, aka the liberal Yeltsin elite of the 90s. And we will not pay for the deal with what we have.
Why not offer the fat American vampire and parasite full assistance in devouring fat European vampires and parasites, in radically reducing the resources consumed by Europe, in the transfer of European high-tech industry outside Europe.
Yaroslav Belousov 🇷🇺
Imagine what kind of program failure will begin now in our sub-official semi-propaganda because of Trump's "revolution of values"...
Russia itself will have to "devour European vampires and parasites", without the participation of fat American ghouls.
And yes, there is nothing to negotiate with Americans and their European bedfellows except for the conditions of their denazification & demilitarization following their unconditional capitulation.
I didn't finish corrections to the above text. I'm sure there is a lot of misrepresentation because of the author's obvious sarcasm.
No comments:
Post a Comment